Page 1 of 1
Stage III from Evolution Performance Dyno Results on DYNOJET
#1
Posted 07 July 2008 - 12:06 PM
I wish I could post the JPG of the chart but I'm having difficulty for some reason. Keep getting an error message on the upload.
Oh well, I'll just write in the results.
649 Rear Wheel Horsepower
615 Rear Wheel Torque
HP peaked at 6500 rpm
Torque was strong above 600 through 5200 rpm.
88 degrees and 22% Humidity at the time of the dyno. I had the car running off the freeway just 10 minutes prior to the pull so it was not cool engine to start with. I didn't care as I was more interested in the A/F mixture which was a constant 11.5. The fuel was about 92+ octane. I believe the tune actually runs better around 93 octane. I only did one pull and that was enough for me. I could have cooled the engine and perhaps fine tune the octane to get better numbers, but like I said, I really don't care about the horsepower numbers.
If anyone can help with the knowhow about posting pictures it sure would be appreciated.
Oh well, I'll just write in the results.
649 Rear Wheel Horsepower
615 Rear Wheel Torque
HP peaked at 6500 rpm
Torque was strong above 600 through 5200 rpm.
88 degrees and 22% Humidity at the time of the dyno. I had the car running off the freeway just 10 minutes prior to the pull so it was not cool engine to start with. I didn't care as I was more interested in the A/F mixture which was a constant 11.5. The fuel was about 92+ octane. I believe the tune actually runs better around 93 octane. I only did one pull and that was enough for me. I could have cooled the engine and perhaps fine tune the octane to get better numbers, but like I said, I really don't care about the horsepower numbers.
If anyone can help with the knowhow about posting pictures it sure would be appreciated.
#2
Posted 07 July 2008 - 02:28 PM
If I were you I would limit the RPM to 6250 if you want it to live a long life-Per Ford SVT engineer
#3
Posted 07 July 2008 - 05:35 PM
fatchile, on Jul 7 2008, 03:28 PM, said:
If I were you I would limit the RPM to 6250 if you want it to live a long life-Per Ford SVT engineer
He shut it down when it was just shy of 6500. Based on the dyno sheet I probably shouldn't take it about 5200 for optimum results. Believe me, this car hasn't seen 6500 before and I don't intend on abusing it. Thanks for the advice though.
#4
Posted 07 July 2008 - 06:45 PM
Very nice numbers, posting pics on the board is a pain for me. I seem to always have to transfer to photobucket, resize and then post. I am sure there is an easier way. I would like to see the dyno sheet if possible. Those are very good numbers congrats! Its always fun comparing and checking out the different combinations. And since it was on a Dynojet even easier.
I have been e-mailing my dyno info to anyone that requests it. Much quicker and easier for attachments.
look forward to seeing your pic's.
Steve
I have been e-mailing my dyno info to anyone that requests it. Much quicker and easier for attachments.
look forward to seeing your pic's.
Steve
#5
Posted 08 July 2008 - 08:56 PM
srk1959, on Jul 7 2008, 07:45 PM, said:
Very nice numbers, posting pics on the board is a pain for me. I seem to always have to transfer to photobucket, resize and then post. I am sure there is an easier way. I would like to see the dyno sheet if possible. Those are very good numbers congrats! Its always fun comparing and checking out the different combinations. And since it was on a Dynojet even easier.
I have been e-mailing my dyno info to anyone that requests it. Much quicker and easier for attachments.
look forward to seeing your pic's.
Steve
I have been e-mailing my dyno info to anyone that requests it. Much quicker and easier for attachments.
look forward to seeing your pic's.
Steve
I'm still getting an error message upon upload. I'll let Brad post it for me.
#6
Posted 09 July 2008 - 06:36 AM
idrathergolf, on Jul 8 2008, 10:56 PM, said:
I'm still getting an error message upon upload. I'll let Brad post it for me.
Great! I just e-mailed Brad. He has my run files, should make an interesting comparison. I am pretty sure yours was the GT500 he mention.
This post has been edited by srk1959: 09 July 2008 - 06:38 AM
#7
Posted 09 July 2008 - 06:47 AM
srk1959, on Jul 9 2008, 07:36 AM, said:
Great! I just e-mailed Brad. He has my run files, should make an interesting comparison. I am pretty sure yours was the GT500 he mention.
hi steve, yes. it is dana's gt500. here is his dyno sheet. i am going to compare his stage 3 to your stage 4 side by side. i'll post it up.
Dyno_Shelby_GT500.pdf (424.76K)
Number of downloads: 36
#8
Posted 10 July 2008 - 05:20 PM
Hey guys just did an Evo stage three @ Evo . Fred's dyno was booked. Can anyone post a similar dyno result for a stage 3 ? Thanks Fran
Page 1 of 1
Sign In
Register
Help



Bookmark
Del.icio.us
Digg
Email
Facebook
Google
Mixx
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Back to top
MultiQuote



